data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28038/280389882d84857634ebd9cc9a115dd8852f41d3" alt=""
DiStefano and colleagues surveyed all the American state and Canadian provincial agencies in detail. They found that about half of the jurisdictions responding reported problems caused by crayfish used as bait. Yet of those, only a few had banned the use of crayfish as bait outright. The other states and provinces had some other legislation intended to prevent the introduction of exotic crayfish, such as limiting how far they could be transported. This tremendous hodgepodge of rules and regulations doesn’t lend itself to easy enforcement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0c71/b0c71358780c74354a160d3be1b4f8c59b8321e0" alt=""
Some shops had legal crayfish species that were gotten by an illegal means (e.g., from out of state).
Almost none of the shop owners had a clue about what species of crayfish they had.
Even if the bait shops were following all the laws (which were few and far between), there’s no way of knowing what the fishermen they sold the bait to did.
It’s difficult to know how many introductions have been caused by a combination of careless bait shop owners and fishermen, but this paper provides some hints of past introductions that could have been cause by crayfish being released as bait. Procambarus acutus is mainly distributed in the south-eastern corner of the state, but there are pockets further north that are probably the result of bait sales.
In short, using any crayfish as live bait is a problem! About the only exception would be a crayfish you catch at the bank of the river or lake you intend to fish in.
Reference
DiStefano RJ, Litvan ME, Horner PT. 2009. The bait industry as a potential vector for alien crayfish introductions: problem recognition by fisheries agencies and a Missouri evaluation. Fisheries 34(12): 567-597. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446-34.12.586
Crossposted from the Marmorkrebs blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment